Hey, I am sorry, but can anybody be more annoyed as I am about the Pro Life vs. Pro Choice debate. Well, ...besides a woman with an unwanted pregnancy. And, an embryo shortly before its aborted? ( I wrote that as a question because that's a big part of the argument, "Does LIFE start at conception?". I don't know and more than likely given that we have the limitations of being mortal, no one else really knows either. Right?
But, one thing that I do know, if we work together from both sides of the debate, we can do away with the existing Pros. Then comes to a Pro Compromise.
A Pro Compromise is the settlement of differences between Pro Choice and Pro Life. To be fair about it, both sides have very good points. But, since they are so polar opposites and the winning methodology will govern so many different types of people, with so many varied believes and distinct situations. So, a compromise between the two will have a lot to overcome. Right? Wrong!..., at the least, I think so. There are only two main issues.
Here are the differences between the two issues. They are in a very simple explanation, but I think it is still spot on. Pro Choice focuses mainly on the rights of the mother, to have a baby or not, for whatever her reason. Pro Life focuses of the life of the baby, without taking in the desire, situation, and/or ability of the mother, to have said, baby. Right? Well, I think so.
It seems that each side is talking at one another and not listening to the other side. All I hear after awhile is: I'm right and you are wrong. Well basically.
Okay with that said, I really hope and pray that this will sound obvious to you. I mean to the point of DA! So, here is my attempt for a Pro Compromise.
To satisfy both the Pro Choice and Pro Life's main concerns. The mother or female will be able to terminate her pregnancy, without terminating the life of the embryo/baby.
But, first before we start, here are two definitions. These are for someone like me; that is completely layman when it comes to medical terminologies and procedures.
1. The trans-vaginal ultrasound aspiration. This is simply, the way that doctors surgically retrieve mature eggs from an egg's donor, for vitro fertilization and/or surrogate implantation. It can be preformed up to a couple of weeks from conception.
2. A Caesarean section (C-section) is used when early delivery is necessary due to medical reasons and/or vaginal delivery might pose a risk to the mother or baby. It can be preformed as early as 7 1/2 months.
So, one of the main reasons why I mention the two definitions above, is to remind us that we can remove embryo/baby without aborting him or her.
Okay, since I don't have a working laboratory, so I will invite you into my imagination. Well, for a while. Then you don't have to go home, but you got to leave here, ha.
Okay, now here, please put on a pair of my rose colored glasses. Fair warning, this is not intended to be the answer to our problem, but is the question that our medical professionals should be asking themselves.
Just imagine that we could create an artificial womb to place the embryo in so that it can develop to maturity. And, it is not like this is so farfetched and completely out there. Because, medical professionals have been making strides with the cloning of the human body parts. Also, they have been experimenting with 3D printing of the human body parts. And, they have conducted inter-species transplantation (hogs' heart, etc). So, it stands to reason that they can, probably in the near future, create a functioning artificial womb.
Now, once a functioning artificial womb is accomplished. They can stop aborting the embryos and transplant them into a functioning artificial womb.
This will create the best of both worlds. The woman will not have to carry, nurture, and/or care for the embryo/baby. And, the embryo/baby gets to live.
Hey, just a thought. Well anyway, it could break the stalemate and allow us, meaning everyone, to win. Checkmate! So, that's the paradigm, and this maybe the tool to shift it. Now, let's get to shifting.
I know that social change is at best hard and very slow moving. But, I hope that the simple pointing out of this rudimentary solution, will stimulate the minds that are much more suited for the task of bring the Pro Compromise into fulfillment.
Then the debate will be more about corrective or fine tuning of the Pro Compromise, like:
*How to care for the children, until they are productive adults.
*Improving orphanages and foster care.
*Giving more support and education to people who want to adopt. Etc.
This is the end, and I hope, and pray you enjoyed it.
Thanks for paying attention.
----------------------------------------------------
I'm Ray Judson JR-II from Um-What,Llc. A newly established private think tank with ideas that are aligned with the betterment of the world. We have a couple of very thought provoking ideas and a few little do-dads that will make you go hmm, to check them out at http://www.umwhatllc.com And, we are crowd-funding for an immensely clever idea that will stop 99%+ of identity theft before the transaction is made, go to http://www.identityfraudfix.com
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
Sunday, March 2, 2014
The Off/On Maneuver - New Thoughts On The Eradication Of HIV, The Virus That Causes AIDS
Hello everyone,
I truly believe, if you give me your attention, I will WOW you. Maybe, not in presentation, but definitely in content.
I have read recently that they, have reportedly, cured a baby and a few others of HIV/AIDS. Now, that is a very good thing. The problem is they can not reproduce it. They do not know and understand the complete mechanism that resulted into the cure. They are seemingly stumbling around in the dark. They may eventually find the light switch. Right? But, until then here is a flashlight.
To all doctors and medical professionals, please excuse my theory for being written in a straight forward, simply put, and layman's format or style. This is due to me not being a medical professional, what so-ever. But, if you will work through the lack of my professionalism, you will see that the Off/On Maneuver may hold some merit.
The Off/On Maneuver
The Off/On Maneuver is a theory that suggest, a new way for us to look at the cure of AIDS. Instead of trying to boost or fortify the immune system, the Off/On Maneuver will disrupt the HIV's existence cycle or life cycle, depending on your point of view.
In order for a full understanding of this theory, you must first know how HIV's existence cycle works in an infected body and what is AIDS.
Here is an excerpt from an article, for a decent explaination of what the HIV is and virus Replication, which is vital to understand the Off/On Maneuver.
" By Regina Bailey, About.com Viruses are intracellular obligate parasites which means that they cannot replicate or express their genes without the help of a living cell. A single virus particle (virion) is in and of itself essentially inert. It lacks needed components that cells have to reproduce. When a virus infects a cell, it marshals the cell's ribosomes, enzymes and much of the cellular machinery to replicate. Unlike what we have seen in cellular replication processes such as mitosis and meiosis, viral replication produces many progeny, that when complete, leave the host cell to infect other cells in the organism."
Okay, what I think she is saying in connection to The Off/On Maneuver in layman terms is that, the HIV existence cycle works by the HIV attaching to T-cells (one of the key components of the immune system). The virus then will reprogram the T-cells to stop their usual functions and start replicating more HIV inside of the T- cells, over and over until they burst the T-cells' wall, destroying the T-cells. This will release next wave of the virus into the infected person's body to repeat the cycle on other T-cells. Until there are no more or a very small amount of T-cells left, which is the definition of AIDS.
The Off/On Maneuver is a hypothesis that suggests a new way to look at the cure of AIDS. Since it is seemingly, impossible to create a drug that can completely stop the HIV from invading the T-cells and making them replicate more HIV viruses. And, also boosting or fortifying our immune system, so far, is eventually ending in early fatality. The Off/On Maneuver will disrupt the HIV's life cycle completely by getting rid of the T-cells, for a period of time. And without the T-cells the HIV can not replicate itself. Then reestablishing the T-cells, after the existing HIV has died out.
But firstly, we must establish a Homeostasis Congruent Environment (a clean room, where the patient will be placed in a sterile living area) to stop the patient (a person infected with HIV) from dying from the common cold or any other of the common illnesses that can kill anyone with a compromised immune system.
Secondly, he/she will be checked for existing opportunistic infections (EOI), and if any are found, treatment plans are implemented to eradicate or control it or them. Thirdly, we will create a Scheduled AIDS's condition (SAC): (The Off) That's right, you guessed it. We will completely get rid the patient's T-cells. There are several possibilities that I can think of that will accomplish this so health care professionals can more than likely think of many more. Some people may think a few of my ideas are inhumane, and some may seem as far-fetched as my hypothesis, but here goes (2) of them anyway.
In order of most far-fetched to most likely.:
1a. Immunosuppressive drugs, like the ones that are used to stop a patient's immune system from attacking his donated organ transplant (acute rejection). Some of them, if calibrated to the correct dosage, can possibly turn off the immune system's T-cells. And, if this one is viable, it will more than likely be the most cost effective.
2a. Chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Even though this may be consider by some, to be very inhumane, but there should be very little argument that almost every day somewhere in the world; this procedure causes a patient to lose her/his immune system, completely ; or greatly diminish it, and this is with the doctors trying not to. So, it stands to reason if they did try to shut the immune system off using this method, I believe, it would be very successful. (Including the T-cells, of course.)
Thirdly, after the scheduled AIDS's condition has been established. Reminder, the virus without the immune system's T-cells to host it, cannot replicate itself. So, it will die out and probably be broken down by enzymes and/or other bio mechanisms and be absorbed into the patient's body as nutrients or be dispelled out of it as waste.
Now, we will give the existing virus the appropriate length of time to die out.
Finally, fourthly, we will re-establish his immune system and including his T-cells. (The On) Here are the (2) ways to turn the immune system and it's T-cells back on, from the above way to turn it off.
1b. Immunosuppressive drugs. Easy, stop administering the drugs. Then maybe help clean the drugs from the body with the drinking of plenty water with a combination of an inferred sauna, using colonic, and/or chelation therapy. These cleansing treatments may help speed-up recover time.
2b. Chemotherapy and radiation treatment. The patient may have to receive and bone morrow transplant. The patient's HIV has die out, and he has a reestablished immune system (via T-cells), he/she is cured.
Look, I want to make it clear. I am not saying that these are the best ways to turn the immune system's T-cells off and back on. I am trying to get you to see, if we establish a Homeostasis Congruent Environment, eliminated or keep under-control the existing opportunistic infections (EOI), then turn the T-cells off, allow the proper amount of time for the HIV to die out after that is done, turn the T-cells back on. We will have a cure, bodda bang bodda boom. I know with the advancement in anti-viral medicines this may not be an immediate alternative for the average HIV positive person. But, there are people with HIV that are anti-viral medicine resistance If properly calibrated this can be a promising alternative for them and others. Oh, and without trying to be flip about it. It can be an alternative to those of us who just don't want HIV and all of the problems that go along with it.
Thanks for paying attention.
----------------------------------------------------
I'm Ray Judson JR-II from Um-What?,llc. A newly established private think tank with ideas that are aligned with the betterment of the world. We have a few very thought provoking ideas and a few little do-dads that will make you go hmm, to check them out at http://www.umwhatllc.com And, we are crowd-funding for an immensely clever idea, that will stop 99%+ of identity theft before the transaction is made, go to http://www.identityfraudfix.com
I truly believe, if you give me your attention, I will WOW you. Maybe, not in presentation, but definitely in content.
I have read recently that they, have reportedly, cured a baby and a few others of HIV/AIDS. Now, that is a very good thing. The problem is they can not reproduce it. They do not know and understand the complete mechanism that resulted into the cure. They are seemingly stumbling around in the dark. They may eventually find the light switch. Right? But, until then here is a flashlight.
To all doctors and medical professionals, please excuse my theory for being written in a straight forward, simply put, and layman's format or style. This is due to me not being a medical professional, what so-ever. But, if you will work through the lack of my professionalism, you will see that the Off/On Maneuver may hold some merit.
The Off/On Maneuver
The Off/On Maneuver is a theory that suggest, a new way for us to look at the cure of AIDS. Instead of trying to boost or fortify the immune system, the Off/On Maneuver will disrupt the HIV's existence cycle or life cycle, depending on your point of view.
In order for a full understanding of this theory, you must first know how HIV's existence cycle works in an infected body and what is AIDS.
Here is an excerpt from an article, for a decent explaination of what the HIV is and virus Replication, which is vital to understand the Off/On Maneuver.
" By Regina Bailey, About.com Viruses are intracellular obligate parasites which means that they cannot replicate or express their genes without the help of a living cell. A single virus particle (virion) is in and of itself essentially inert. It lacks needed components that cells have to reproduce. When a virus infects a cell, it marshals the cell's ribosomes, enzymes and much of the cellular machinery to replicate. Unlike what we have seen in cellular replication processes such as mitosis and meiosis, viral replication produces many progeny, that when complete, leave the host cell to infect other cells in the organism."
Okay, what I think she is saying in connection to The Off/On Maneuver in layman terms is that, the HIV existence cycle works by the HIV attaching to T-cells (one of the key components of the immune system). The virus then will reprogram the T-cells to stop their usual functions and start replicating more HIV inside of the T- cells, over and over until they burst the T-cells' wall, destroying the T-cells. This will release next wave of the virus into the infected person's body to repeat the cycle on other T-cells. Until there are no more or a very small amount of T-cells left, which is the definition of AIDS.
The Off/On Maneuver is a hypothesis that suggests a new way to look at the cure of AIDS. Since it is seemingly, impossible to create a drug that can completely stop the HIV from invading the T-cells and making them replicate more HIV viruses. And, also boosting or fortifying our immune system, so far, is eventually ending in early fatality. The Off/On Maneuver will disrupt the HIV's life cycle completely by getting rid of the T-cells, for a period of time. And without the T-cells the HIV can not replicate itself. Then reestablishing the T-cells, after the existing HIV has died out.
But firstly, we must establish a Homeostasis Congruent Environment (a clean room, where the patient will be placed in a sterile living area) to stop the patient (a person infected with HIV) from dying from the common cold or any other of the common illnesses that can kill anyone with a compromised immune system.
Secondly, he/she will be checked for existing opportunistic infections (EOI), and if any are found, treatment plans are implemented to eradicate or control it or them. Thirdly, we will create a Scheduled AIDS's condition (SAC): (The Off) That's right, you guessed it. We will completely get rid the patient's T-cells. There are several possibilities that I can think of that will accomplish this so health care professionals can more than likely think of many more. Some people may think a few of my ideas are inhumane, and some may seem as far-fetched as my hypothesis, but here goes (2) of them anyway.
In order of most far-fetched to most likely.:
1a. Immunosuppressive drugs, like the ones that are used to stop a patient's immune system from attacking his donated organ transplant (acute rejection). Some of them, if calibrated to the correct dosage, can possibly turn off the immune system's T-cells. And, if this one is viable, it will more than likely be the most cost effective.
2a. Chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Even though this may be consider by some, to be very inhumane, but there should be very little argument that almost every day somewhere in the world; this procedure causes a patient to lose her/his immune system, completely ; or greatly diminish it, and this is with the doctors trying not to. So, it stands to reason if they did try to shut the immune system off using this method, I believe, it would be very successful. (Including the T-cells, of course.)
Thirdly, after the scheduled AIDS's condition has been established. Reminder, the virus without the immune system's T-cells to host it, cannot replicate itself. So, it will die out and probably be broken down by enzymes and/or other bio mechanisms and be absorbed into the patient's body as nutrients or be dispelled out of it as waste.
Now, we will give the existing virus the appropriate length of time to die out.
Finally, fourthly, we will re-establish his immune system and including his T-cells. (The On) Here are the (2) ways to turn the immune system and it's T-cells back on, from the above way to turn it off.
1b. Immunosuppressive drugs. Easy, stop administering the drugs. Then maybe help clean the drugs from the body with the drinking of plenty water with a combination of an inferred sauna, using colonic, and/or chelation therapy. These cleansing treatments may help speed-up recover time.
2b. Chemotherapy and radiation treatment. The patient may have to receive and bone morrow transplant. The patient's HIV has die out, and he has a reestablished immune system (via T-cells), he/she is cured.
Look, I want to make it clear. I am not saying that these are the best ways to turn the immune system's T-cells off and back on. I am trying to get you to see, if we establish a Homeostasis Congruent Environment, eliminated or keep under-control the existing opportunistic infections (EOI), then turn the T-cells off, allow the proper amount of time for the HIV to die out after that is done, turn the T-cells back on. We will have a cure, bodda bang bodda boom. I know with the advancement in anti-viral medicines this may not be an immediate alternative for the average HIV positive person. But, there are people with HIV that are anti-viral medicine resistance If properly calibrated this can be a promising alternative for them and others. Oh, and without trying to be flip about it. It can be an alternative to those of us who just don't want HIV and all of the problems that go along with it.
Thanks for paying attention.
----------------------------------------------------
I'm Ray Judson JR-II from Um-What?,llc. A newly established private think tank with ideas that are aligned with the betterment of the world. We have a few very thought provoking ideas and a few little do-dads that will make you go hmm, to check them out at http://www.umwhatllc.com And, we are crowd-funding for an immensely clever idea, that will stop 99%+ of identity theft before the transaction is made, go to http://www.identityfraudfix.com
Friday, February 7, 2014
Proven Tactics For Training Your Memory - Tips Provided
Getting older does not mean that your memory house to fail! You can improve your memory and make it stronger everyday. It is important that you learn how to remember things, by exercising your brain and memory every day, so that it stays sharp as you move into your later years. On the other hand, making a conscious effort to sharpen your memory can have amazing results. In this article, we will present several tactics and strategies you can use to make your memory better.
You can keep your memory sharp by making regular use of it. Every day you should go out of your way to find ways to keep your memory active, by doing mental activities. Puzzles keep your memory activated when you are doing them, whether in a book or on some web site. Doing crossword puzzles regularly, for example, makes your mind work and forces you to recall many types of knowledge. Many different card games are good for your memory, as well as games which cause you to think, like trivia games or chess. You can also improve your memory by learning skills such as a new language.
Blackberries, according to research, can improve our health. Blackberries contain a natural antioxidant that has many positive benefits for the human body if it is consumed regularly.
One way that you can improve your memory, like working out, is to memorize things everyday. By simply practicing with your mind, memorizing things throughout the day, you can improve your memory without having to purchase special courses or do tricks to help your memory improve. It is possible to memorize classic poems that you like to listen to. Focus on topics you enjoy so that memorizing the material is more fulfilling. Read as much as you can about this topic, and make it a point to memorize certain dates, names or other relevant aspects of the information.
To see if you're actually able to remember what you were memorizing, test yourself daily. From there, pick up a trivia book and start memorizing random facts about things you knew nothing about. When you use memory training, any type of information can be remembered. Once you start investigating the many techniques for improving your memory, you'll find that there are quite a few. Your memory can be strengthened if that is your intention, which is the first step. Then it's just a matter of consistently practicing a few methods that appeal to you.
----------------------------------------------------
If you would like knowledge regarding professors guide to getting good grades in college go to http://howtogetgoodgrades.org/ or check-out this useful site in order to discover what has been used by a lot of of folks visiting http://howtogetgoodgrades.org/teach-me-how-to-study/
You can keep your memory sharp by making regular use of it. Every day you should go out of your way to find ways to keep your memory active, by doing mental activities. Puzzles keep your memory activated when you are doing them, whether in a book or on some web site. Doing crossword puzzles regularly, for example, makes your mind work and forces you to recall many types of knowledge. Many different card games are good for your memory, as well as games which cause you to think, like trivia games or chess. You can also improve your memory by learning skills such as a new language.
Blackberries, according to research, can improve our health. Blackberries contain a natural antioxidant that has many positive benefits for the human body if it is consumed regularly.
One way that you can improve your memory, like working out, is to memorize things everyday. By simply practicing with your mind, memorizing things throughout the day, you can improve your memory without having to purchase special courses or do tricks to help your memory improve. It is possible to memorize classic poems that you like to listen to. Focus on topics you enjoy so that memorizing the material is more fulfilling. Read as much as you can about this topic, and make it a point to memorize certain dates, names or other relevant aspects of the information.
To see if you're actually able to remember what you were memorizing, test yourself daily. From there, pick up a trivia book and start memorizing random facts about things you knew nothing about. When you use memory training, any type of information can be remembered. Once you start investigating the many techniques for improving your memory, you'll find that there are quite a few. Your memory can be strengthened if that is your intention, which is the first step. Then it's just a matter of consistently practicing a few methods that appeal to you.
----------------------------------------------------
If you would like knowledge regarding professors guide to getting good grades in college go to http://howtogetgoodgrades.org/ or check-out this useful site in order to discover what has been used by a lot of of folks visiting http://howtogetgoodgrades.org/teach-me-how-to-study/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)